Analyzed statement

What Sérgio Moro said about compel witnesses to attend summonses of Parliamentary Inquiry Commissions

About: compel witnesses to attend summonses of Parliamentary Inquiry Commissions

Sérgio Moro: Thus it approved the breaking of fiscal and banking secrecy, and nevertheless, we were now prevented from exercising that power.

Sérgio Moro: I have argued, Senator Plínio Valério, that we also need to review the normative attributions of CPIs (Parliamentary Inquiry Commissions).

When a CPI summons an individual to testify, whether as a witness or as an investigated person, it is imperative that that person appear, under penalty, after proper service, of being brought in coercively, as occurs in a police inquiry.

Sérgio Moro · 4:15

Sérgio Moro: The investigating officer issues a summons to hear someone, and the CPI has investigative powers similar to those of police authorities — and even powers equivalent to judicial authority in some cases, except in hypotheses of an absolute judicial reserve — however, we have seen a profusion of absences at CPIs, under the pretext of protecting the right to remain silent.

Sérgio Moro: I respect that understanding of part of the Supreme Court, that a person even has the possibility of not appearing, but I do not readily see that as a natural unfolding of the right to remain silent.

Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence

proposes coercive bringing for those who do not appear after being summoned.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology